brendan halpin

Hey, so I’ve noticed that the definition of “one-hit wonder” seems to be shifting a little bit. Or maybe I’ve just misunderstood it all along. So I wanted to take a minute to address this crucially important issue.

In my understanding, a one-hit wonder is not simply an artist who had one hit, but, rather, an artist who had one hit and then disappeared. I have, for example, seen people refer to Los Lobos as a one-hit wonder because they had one monster pop hit with their cover of “La Bamba” and never hit the charts again. But this is a band that’s been at it for 45 years and has released 14 studio albums since they topped the charts back in ‘86.

I posit that a one-hit wonder is an artist who had one hit and then disappeared, or released a follow up that sank like a stone and then disappeared.

But somebody like OMC, who had one hit in ‘95 with “How Bizarre,” and then disappeared, counts as a one-hit wonder.

We run into an interesting dilemma here based on nationality. So someone like Gotye, for example, certainly seems to be a one-hit wonder in the USA, but I guess had earlier hits in Australia? Or Right Said Fred, who were too sexy for their shirts and then disappeared from the USA, but continue to perform in their UK. Still, I’d classify both as one-hit wonders in the US.

Paul Hardcastle, of “19” fame. ? and the Mysterians of “96 Tears” fame. Young MC of “Bust a Move” fame. These, my friends, are one-hit wonders.

Am I wrong here? Is the definition of a one-hit wonder simply any artist who ever had only one chart hit? I’d ask you to weigh in in the comments, but I don’t have comments. Click on the “contact me” link above and let me know!